bigquery pipeline audit
bigquery-pipeline-audit
Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.
Introduction source: author · github · b6483db44fb602654bca6a097185fcaddb305f97 Reference
Author's original introduction
Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.
SkillPi interpretation
- Tasks
- bigquery pipeline audit
- Audience
- Use the scenarios stated in the author's introduction.
- Inputs and outputs
- See the complete author document; outputs have not been runtime verified by SkillPi.
- Software, accounts and paid services
- Check required software, accounts, costs and permissions in the full document; confirm and authorize actual file access and external services in your host. Domains referenced in the documents (not a runtime allowlist): No HTTP(S) domain stated.
- Limits and differences
- Functionality, version status and outcome statements in the introduction are author claims. Only pinned source and static attachment evidence were checked; runtime behavior, external services and compatibility are not guaranteed.
- Testing
- Not tested
Permissions and checks before use
Automatically summarized from this main document. Matches may be examples or defensive advice; they are not actual permission declarations. Attachments, external dependencies and runtime behavior are not covered.
These common operations were not identified in the main document. This does not mean no permissions or risks exist.
Security rating and access scope
caution · Static evidence review; not a runtime safety guarantee.
Check required software, accounts, costs and permissions in the full document; confirm and authorize actual file access and external services in your host. Domains referenced in the documents (not a runtime allowlist): No HTTP(S) domain stated.
Before use, confirm and authorize actual file access, external services and network destinations in your host. This review grants no runtime permissions.
Original SKILL.md
---
name: bigquery-pipeline-audit
description: 'Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.'
---
# BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness
You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script.
Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt
data, and make sure failures are visible.
Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final).
Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not
rewrites.
---
## A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?
Locate every BigQuery job trigger (`client.query`, `load_table_from_*`,
`extract_table`, `copy_table`, DDL/DML via query) and every external call
(APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).
For each, answer:
- Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
- What is the realistic worst-case call count?
- For each `client.query`, is `QueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billed` set?
For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS?
- Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run?
Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.
**Flag immediately if:**
- Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
- Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
- `maximum_bytes_billed` is missing on any `client.query` call
---
## B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES
Verify a `--mode` flag exists with at least `dry_run` and `execute` options.
- `dry_run` must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution
(BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM calls
- `execute` requires explicit confirmation for prod (`--env=prod --confirm`)
- Prod must not be the default environment
If missing, propose a minimal `argparse` patch with safe defaults.
---
## C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN
**Hard fail if:** the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.
Check that date-range backfills use one of:
1. A single set-based query with `GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY`
2. A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
3. Explicit chunks with a hard `MAX_CHUNKS` cap
Also check:
- Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without `--override`)?
- If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
- For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots
(`FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF`, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables).
Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.
Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.
---
## D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE
For each query, check:
- **Partition filter** is on the raw column, not `DATE(ts)`, `CAST(...)`, or
any function that prevents pruning
- **No `SELECT *`**: only columns actually used downstream
- **Joins will not explode**: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped
and flag any potential many-to-many
- **Expensive operations** (`REGEXP`, `JSON_EXTRACT`, UDFs) only run after
partition filtering, not on full table scans
Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.
---
## E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY
Identify every write operation. Flag plain `INSERT`/append with no dedup logic.
Each write should use one of:
1. `MERGE` on a deterministic key (e.g., `entity_id + date + model_version`)
2. Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
3. Append-only with a dedupe view:
`QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1`
Also check:
- Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
- Is the write disposition (`WRITE_TRUNCATE` vs `WRITE_APPEND`) intentional
and documented?
- Is `run_id` being used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it.
`run_id` should be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness
key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.
State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.
---
## F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?
Verify:
- Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent `except: pass` or warn-only
- Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available,
slot milliseconds, and duration
- A run summary is logged or written at the end containing:
`run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes`
- `run_id` is present and consistent across all log lines
If `run_id` is missing, propose a one-line fix:
`run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')`
---
## Final
**1. PASS / FAIL** with specific reasons per section (A to F).
**2. Patch list** ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change.
**3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks** with a rough worst-case estimate
(e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").
Copyright and license notice
MIT License Copyright GitHub, Inc. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
User discussion