基于 deps.dev 的依赖赞助线索发现

作者原文

Find which of a GitHub repository's dependencies are sponsorable via GitHub Sponsors. Uses deps.dev API for dependency resolution across npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, RubyGems, Maven, and NuGet. Checks npm funding metadata, FUNDING.yml files, and web search. Verifies every link. Shows direct and transitive dependencies with OSSF Scorecard health data. Invoke with /sponsor followed by a GitHub owner/repo (e.g. "/sponsor expressjs/express").

SkillPi 解读

能完成的任务

解析依赖树、映射软件包仓库、查找资助元数据、核验目标地址，并按维护者汇总报告。

适合谁

希望了解可支持哪些依赖维护者的开发者与项目维护者。

输入和输出

输入 GitHub owner/repo 及依赖清单；输出分组后的可核验资助链接、依赖覆盖与项目健康背景，报告本身不执行付款。

软件、账号及付费要求

需要 GitHub 文件访问、deps.dev 与软件包注册表 API，以及网页访问和检索工具。私有仓库需权限，服务限流可能导致部分报告。 使用时由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写和外部服务。文档引用域名（非运行白名单）：api.deps.dev, docs.github.com, github.com, ko-fi.com, opencollective.com, patreon.com, registry.npmjs.org, tidelift.com

限制与区别

资助地址会变化，执行时必须重新核验。OSSF Scorecard 仅供参考，不是安全证明。本介绍未解析用户实际依赖，也未验证任何实际赞助目标。

实测状态

未测试

安全评级与访问范围

caution · 静态证据核验，不代表运行安全保证。

需要 GitHub 文件访问、deps.dev 与软件包注册表 API，以及网页访问和检索工具。私有仓库需权限，服务限流可能导致部分报告。 使用时由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写和外部服务。文档引用域名（非运行白名单）：api.deps.dev, docs.github.com, github.com, ko-fi.com, opencollective.com, patreon.com, registry.npmjs.org, tidelift.com

使用前请由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写、外部服务和联网目的地；本站的核验不会授予任何运行权限。

原始 SKILL.md

---
name: sponsor-finder
description: Find which of a GitHub repository's dependencies are sponsorable via GitHub Sponsors. Uses deps.dev API for dependency resolution across npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, RubyGems, Maven, and NuGet. Checks npm funding metadata, FUNDING.yml files, and web search. Verifies every link. Shows direct and transitive dependencies with OSSF Scorecard health data. Invoke with /sponsor followed by a GitHub owner/repo (e.g. "/sponsor expressjs/express").
---

# Sponsor Finder

Discover opportunities to support the open source maintainers behind your project's dependencies. Accepts a GitHub `owner/repo` (e.g. `/sponsor expressjs/express`), uses the deps.dev API for dependency resolution and project health data, and produces a friendly sponsorship report covering both direct and transitive dependencies.

## Your Workflow

When the user types `/sponsor {owner/repo}` or provides a repository in `owner/repo` format:

1. **Parse the input** — Extract `owner` and `repo`.
2. **Detect the ecosystem** — Fetch manifest to determine package name + version.
3. **Get full dependency tree** — deps.dev `GetDependencies` (one call).
4. **Resolve repos** — deps.dev `GetVersion` for each dep → `relatedProjects` gives GitHub repo.
5. **Get project health** — deps.dev `GetProject` for unique repos → OSSF Scorecard.
6. **Find funding links** — npm `funding` field, FUNDING.yml, web search fallback.
7. **Verify every link** — fetch each URL to confirm it's live.
8. **Group and report** — by funding destination, sorted by impact.

---

## Step 1: Detect Ecosystem and Package

Use `get_file_contents` to fetch the manifest from the target repo. Determine the ecosystem and extract the package name + latest version:

| File | Ecosystem | Package name from | Version from |
|------|-----------|-------------------|--------------|
| `package.json` | NPM | `name` field | `version` field |
| `requirements.txt` | PYPI | list of package names | use latest (omit version in deps.dev call) |
| `pyproject.toml` | PYPI | `[project.dependencies]` | use latest |
| `Cargo.toml` | CARGO | `[package] name` | `[package] version` |
| `go.mod` | GO | `module` path | extract from go.mod |
| `Gemfile` | RUBYGEMS | gem names | use latest |
| `pom.xml` | MAVEN | `groupId:artifactId` | `version` |

---

## Step 2: Get Full Dependency Tree (deps.dev)

**This is the key step.** Use `web_fetch` to call the deps.dev API:

```
https://api.deps.dev/v3/systems/{ECOSYSTEM}/packages/{PACKAGE}/versions/{VERSION}:dependencies
```

For example:
```
https://api.deps.dev/v3/systems/npm/packages/express/versions/5.2.1:dependencies
```

This returns a `nodes` array where each node has:
- `versionKey.name` — package name
- `versionKey.version` — resolved version
- `relation` — `"SELF"`, `"DIRECT"`, or `"INDIRECT"`

**This single call gives you the entire dependency tree** — both direct and transitive — with exact resolved versions. No need to parse lockfiles.

### URL encoding
Package names containing special characters must be percent-encoded:
- `@colors/colors` → `%40colors%2Fcolors`
- Encode `@` as `%40`, `/` as `%2F`

### For repos without a single root package
If the repo doesn't publish a package (e.g., it's an app not a library), fall back to reading `package.json` dependencies directly and calling deps.dev `GetVersion` for each.

---

## Step 3: Resolve Each Dependency to a GitHub Repo (deps.dev)

For each dependency from the tree, call deps.dev `GetVersion`:

```
https://api.deps.dev/v3/systems/{ECOSYSTEM}/packages/{NAME}/versions/{VERSION}
```

From the response, extract:
- **`relatedProjects`** → look for `relationType: "SOURCE_REPO"` → `projectKey.id` gives `github.com/{owner}/{repo}`
- **`links`** → look for `label: "SOURCE_REPO"` → `url` field

This works across **all ecosystems** — npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, RubyGems, Maven, NuGet — with the same field structure.

### Efficiency rules
- Process in batches of **10 at a time**.
- Deduplicate — multiple packages may map to the same repo.
- Skip deps where no GitHub project is found (count as "unresolvable").

---

## Step 4: Get Project Health Data (deps.dev)

For each unique GitHub repo, call deps.dev `GetProject`:

```
https://api.deps.dev/v3/projects/github.com%2F{owner}%2F{repo}
```

From the response, extract:
- **`scorecard.checks`** → find the `"Maintained"` check → `score` (0–10)
- **`starsCount`** — popularity indicator
- **`license`** — project license
- **`openIssuesCount`** — activity indicator

Use the Maintained score to label project health:
- Score 7–10 → ⭐ Actively maintained
- Score 4–6 → ⚠️ Partially maintained
- Score 0–3 → 💤 Possibly unmaintained

### Efficiency rules
- Only fetch for **unique repos** (not per-package).
- Process in batches of **10 at a time**.
- This step is optional — skip if rate-limited and note in output.

---

## Step 5: Find Funding Links

For each unique GitHub repo, check for funding information using three sources in order:

### 5a: npm `funding` field (npm ecosystem only)
Use `web_fetch` on `https://registry.npmjs.org/{package-name}/latest` and check for a `funding` field:
- **String:** `"https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"` → use as URL
- **Object:** `{"type": "opencollective", "url": "https://opencollective.com/express"}` → use `url`
- **Array:** collect all URLs

### 5b: `.github/FUNDING.yml` (repo-level, then org-level fallback)

**Step 5b-i — Per-repo check:**
Use `get_file_contents` to fetch `{owner}/{repo}` path `.github/FUNDING.yml`.

**Step 5b-ii — Org/user-level fallback:**
If 5b-i returned 404 (no FUNDING.yml in the repo itself), check the owner's default community health repo:
Use `get_file_contents` to fetch `{owner}/.github` path `FUNDING.yml`.

GitHub supports a [default community health files](https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/creating-a-default-community-health-file) convention: a `.github` repository at the user/org level provides defaults for all repos that lack their own. For example, `isaacs/.github/FUNDING.yml` applies to all `isaacs/*` repos.

Only look up each unique `{owner}/.github` repo **once** — reuse the result for all repos under that owner. Process in batches of **10 owners at a time**.

Parse the YAML (same for both 5b-i and 5b-ii):
- `github: [username]` → `https://github.com/sponsors/{username}`
- `open_collective: slug` → `https://opencollective.com/{slug}`
- `ko_fi: username` → `https://ko-fi.com/{username}`
- `patreon: username` → `https://patreon.com/{username}`
- `tidelift: platform/package` → `https://tidelift.com/subscription/pkg/{platform-package}`
- `custom: [urls]` → use as-is

### 5c: Web search fallback
For the **top 10 unfunded dependencies** (by number of transitive dependents), use `web_search`:
```
"{package name}" github sponsors OR open collective OR funding
```
Skip packages known to be corporate-maintained (React/Meta, TypeScript/Microsoft, @types/DefinitelyTyped).

### Efficiency rules
- **Check 5a and 5b for all deps.** Only use 5c for top unfunded ones.
- Skip npm registry calls for non-npm ecosystems.
- Deduplicate repos — check each repo only once.
- **One `{owner}/.github` check per unique owner** — reuse the result for all their repos.
- Process org-level lookups in batches of **10 owners at a time**.

---

## Step 6: Verify Every Link (CRITICAL)

**Before including ANY funding link, verify it exists.**

Use `web_fetch` on each funding URL:
- **Valid page** → ✅ Include
- **404 / "not found" / "not enrolled"** → ❌ Exclude
- **Redirect to valid page** → ✅ Include final URL

Verify in batches of **5 at a time**. Never present unverified links.

---

## Step 7: Output the Report

### Output discipline

**Minimize intermediate output during data gathering.** Do NOT announce each batch ("Batch 3 of 7…", "Now checking funding…"). Instead:
- Show **one brief status line** when starting each major phase (e.g., "Resolving 67 dependencies…", "Checking funding links…")
- **Collect ALL data before producing the report.** Never drip-feed partial tables.
- Output the final report as a **single cohesive block** at the end.

### Report template

```
## 💜 Sponsor Finder Report

**Repository:** {owner}/{repo} · {ecosystem} · {package}@{version}
**Scanned:** {date} · {total} deps ({direct} direct + {transitive} transitive)

---

### 🎯 Ways to Give Back

Sponsoring just {N} people/orgs supports {sponsorable} of your {total} dependencies — a great way to invest in the open source your project depends on.

1. **💜 @{user}** — {N} direct + {M} transitive deps · ⭐ Maintained
   {dep1}, {dep2}, {dep3}, ...
   https://github.com/sponsors/{user}

2. **🟠 Open Collective: {name}** — {N} direct + {M} transitive deps · ⭐ Maintained
   {dep1}, {dep2}, {dep3}, ...
   https://opencollective.com/{name}

3. **💜 @{user2}** — {N} direct dep · 💤 Low activity
   {dep1}
   https://github.com/sponsors/{user2}

---

### 📊 Coverage

- **{sponsorable}/{total}** dependencies have funding options ({percentage}%)
- **{destinations}** unique funding destinations
- **{unfunded_direct}** direct deps don't have funding set up yet ({top_names}, ...)
- All links verified ✅
```

### Report format rules

- **Lead with "🎯 Ways to Give Back"** — this is the primary output. Numbered list, sorted by total deps covered (descending).
- **Bare URLs on their own line** — not wrapped in markdown link syntax. This ensures they're clickable in any terminal emulator.
- **Inline dep names** — list the covered dependency names in a comma-separated line under each sponsor, so the user sees exactly what they're funding.
- **Health indicator inline** — show ⭐/⚠️/💤 next to each destination, not in a separate table column.
- **One "📊 Coverage" section** — compact stats. No separate "Verified Funding Links" table, no "No Funding Found" table.
- **Unfunded deps as a brief note** — just the count + top names. Frame as "don't have funding set up yet" rather than highlighting a gap. Never shame projects for not having funding — many maintainers prefer other forms of contribution.
- 💜 GitHub Sponsors, 🟠 Open Collective, ☕ Ko-fi, 🔗 Other
- Prioritize GitHub Sponsors links when multiple funding sources exist for the same maintainer.

---

## Error Handling

- If deps.dev returns 404 for the package → fall back to reading the manifest directly and resolving via registry APIs.
- If deps.dev is rate-limited → note partial results, continue with what was fetched.
- If `get_file_contents` returns 404 for the repo → inform user repo may not exist or is private.
- If link verification fails → exclude the link silently.
- Always produce a report even if partial — never fail silently.

---

## Critical Rules

1. **NEVER present unverified links.** Fetch every URL before showing it. 5 verified links > 20 guessed links.
2. **NEVER guess from training knowledge.** Always check — funding pages change over time.
3. **Always be encouraging, never shaming.** Frame results positively — celebrate what IS funded, and treat unfunded deps as an opportunity, not a failing. Not every project needs or wants financial sponsorship.
4. **Lead with action.** The "🎯 Ways to Give Back" section is the primary output — bare clickable URLs, grouped by destination.
5. **Use deps.dev as primary resolver.** Fall back to registry APIs only if deps.dev is unavailable.
6. **Always use GitHub MCP tools** (`get_file_contents`), `web_fetch`, and `web_search` — never clone or shell out.
7. **Be efficient.** Batch API calls, deduplicate repos, check each owner's `.github` repo only once.
8. **Focus on GitHub Sponsors.** Most actionable platform — show others but prioritize GitHub.
9. **Deduplicate by maintainer.** Group to show real impact of sponsoring one person.
10. **Show the actionable minimum.** Tell users the fewest sponsorships to support the most deps.
11. **Minimize intermediate output.** Don't announce each batch. Collect all data, then output one cohesive report.

版权与许可声明

MIT License

Copyright GitHub, Inc.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.