分布式系统云设计模式

作者原文

Cloud design patterns for distributed systems architecture covering 42 industry-standard patterns across reliability, performance, messaging, security, and deployment categories. Use when designing, reviewing, or implementing distributed system architectures.

SkillPi 解读

能完成的任务

分布式系统云设计模式

适合谁

请按作者原文中的适用场景判断。

输入和输出

以作者完整文档为准；本站未运行验证产物。

软件、账号及付费要求

使用前按完整文档确认软件、账号、费用及权限；由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写和外部服务。文档引用域名（非运行白名单）：learn.microsoft.com

限制与区别

原文中的功能、版本状态和效果描述属于作者陈述；中文为对应翻译。仅核对固定版本及静态附件证据，不保证运行效果、外部服务或兼容性。

实测状态

未测试

安全评级与访问范围

caution · 静态证据核验，不代表运行安全保证。

使用前按完整文档确认软件、账号、费用及权限；由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写和外部服务。文档引用域名（非运行白名单）：learn.microsoft.com

使用前请由宿主核对并授权实际文件读写、外部服务和联网目的地；本站的核验不会授予任何运行权限。

原始 SKILL.md

---
name: cloud-design-patterns
description: 'Cloud design patterns for distributed systems architecture covering 42 industry-standard patterns across reliability, performance, messaging, security, and deployment categories. Use when designing, reviewing, or implementing distributed system architectures.'
---

# Cloud Design Patterns

Architects design workloads by integrating platform services, functionality, and code to meet both functional and nonfunctional requirements. To design effective workloads, you must understand these requirements and select topologies and methodologies that address the challenges of your workload's constraints. Cloud design patterns provide solutions to many common challenges.

System design heavily relies on established design patterns. You can design infrastructure, code, and distributed systems by using a combination of these patterns. These patterns are crucial for building reliable, highly secure, cost-optimized, operationally efficient, and high-performing applications in the cloud.

The following cloud design patterns are technology-agnostic, which makes them suitable for any distributed system. You can apply these patterns across Azure, other cloud platforms, on-premises setups, and hybrid environments.

## How Cloud Design Patterns Enhance the Design Process

Cloud workloads are vulnerable to the fallacies of distributed computing, which are common but incorrect assumptions about how distributed systems operate. Examples of these fallacies include:

- The network is reliable.
- Latency is zero.
- Bandwidth is infinite.
- The network is secure.
- Topology doesn't change.
- There's one administrator.
- Component versioning is simple.
- Observability implementation can be delayed.

These misconceptions can result in flawed workload designs. Design patterns don't eliminate these misconceptions but help raise awareness, provide compensation strategies, and provide mitigations. Each cloud design pattern has trade-offs. Focus on why you should choose a specific pattern instead of how to implement it.

---

## References

| Reference | When to load |
|---|---|
| [Reliability & Resilience Patterns](references/reliability-resilience.md) | Ambassador, Bulkhead, Circuit Breaker, Compensating Transaction, Retry, Health Endpoint Monitoring, Leader Election, Saga, Sequential Convoy |
| [Performance Patterns](references/performance.md) | Async Request-Reply, Cache-Aside, CQRS, Index Table, Materialized View, Priority Queue, Queue-Based Load Leveling, Rate Limiting, Sharding, Throttling |
| [Messaging & Integration Patterns](references/messaging-integration.md) | Choreography, Claim Check, Competing Consumers, Messaging Bridge, Pipes and Filters, Publisher-Subscriber, Scheduler Agent Supervisor |
| [Architecture & Design Patterns](references/architecture-design.md) | Anti-Corruption Layer, Backends for Frontends, Gateway Aggregation/Offloading/Routing, Sidecar, Strangler Fig |
| [Deployment & Operational Patterns](references/deployment-operational.md) | Compute Resource Consolidation, Deployment Stamps, External Configuration Store, Geode, Static Content Hosting |
| [Security Patterns](references/security.md) | Federated Identity, Quarantine, Valet Key |
| [Event-Driven Architecture Patterns](references/event-driven.md) | Event Sourcing |
| [Best Practices & Pattern Selection](references/best-practices.md) | Selecting appropriate patterns, Well-Architected Framework alignment, documentation, monitoring |
| [Azure Service Mappings](references/azure-service-mappings.md) | Common Azure services for each pattern category |

---

## Pattern Categories at a Glance

| Category | Patterns | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability & Resilience | 9 patterns | Fault tolerance, self-healing, graceful degradation |
| Performance | 10 patterns | Caching, scaling, load management, data optimization |
| Messaging & Integration | 7 patterns | Decoupling, event-driven communication, workflow coordination |
| Architecture & Design | 7 patterns | System boundaries, API gateways, migration strategies |
| Deployment & Operational | 5 patterns | Infrastructure management, geo-distribution, configuration |
| Security | 3 patterns | Identity, access control, content validation |
| Event-Driven Architecture | 1 pattern | Event sourcing and audit trails |

## External Links

- [Cloud Design Patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/architecture/patterns/)
- [Azure Well-Architected Framework](https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/architecture/framework/)

版权与许可声明

MIT License

Copyright GitHub, Inc.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.